Post-event write up

Following the event, we published a write up which condenses the research contains in Carl Emery and Louisa Dawes’ presentation.

In a classroom of 30, nine children will be in poverty. Place plays an important role in poverty, with the figure being closer to twice that level in some areas of the country. These differences don’t only exist between regions, but often within the same locality. 

In Greater Manchester, for example, we can see this across the 10 boroughs. In Manchester’s leafy suburbs of Chorlton the child poverty rate is 24%, in Gorton only a mile down the road, that number more than doubles to 55%. Some parts of Salford have child poverty rates as low as 13%, while others a few miles away are closer to 59% (ONS Local Area Data, 2018).

This story of the hyper local experiences of poverty is replicated across many parts of the country.

Dr Carl Emery and Dr Louisa Dawes, lecturers in education at The University of Manchester, shared these statistics with policymakers based in Greater Manchester during a university-policy engagement seminar this month, hosted by Policy@Manchester. Their research with local communities explores attitudes to poverty. ‘Local Matters’, exists to challenge the norms surrounding poverty, and to create a structural response to a structural issue using these local findings.

They argue that the dominant model of one-size-fits-all in regard to reducing the attainment gap doesn’t work, and advocate exploring alternative localised approaches, thereby connecting the narrow ‘what works’ policy agenda to ‘what matters’ for people and place.

The evidence base for poverty in the UK is fragile, and their work aims to deconstruct and rebuild it using, what Carl and Louisa refer to as, ‘thick’, localised social research instead.

A ‘thin’ approach might take top-level data on, for example, the percentage of children receiving free-school meals in a given area, to understand the levels of poverty. These ‘thick’, localised approaches ask us not only to look for a greater level of granularity in the data on deprivation, but also to understand the stories of people experiencing poverty. In so doing, to move away from some of the myths we hold about people experiencing poverty. Myths about poverty include the idea that ‘anyone can pull themselves up by their bootstraps’ or that ‘those that are in poverty are lazy or irresponsible’.

These myths about poverty are still widely held beliefs. A survey that formed part of their research demonstrated that attitudes to poverty mirrored those from many decades ago, suggesting that perceptions and ideas of poverty are inherently outdated. For instance, participants were asked to give five words to describe the poverty that they see in their school community, and the most frequent words included ‘hunger’, ‘hidden’ and ‘poor’. In the same survey, participants were asked whether they thought that families living in poverty had high aspirations, to which over half of respondents said that they strongly or somewhat disagree. 

Carl and Louisa go on to emphasise that our belief systems about poverty, and the way we talk about it, significantly shape our actions and what we do about it, and they are calling for a change in attitudes. 

One example of a frontline organisation already implementing Carl and Louisa’s approach is Manchester Central Foodbank. The foodbank use the findings and frameworks offered by the Local Matters approach to help to shape their action plans to target assistance where it is most needed based on local needs and local knowledge. By leveraging this approach, Manchester Central Foodbank are helping children and families in poverty by providing school uniforms and setting up ‘cash first’ assistance schemes. 

Speaking about the partnership, Patsy Davies, campaign coordinator for Manchester Local Foodbank, identifies how “working with the Local Matters research team has provided [them] with a theoretical and methodological framework that [they], at Manchester Central Foodbank, can use to develop our practice and projects to support local communities.”

Instead of providing policy response to poverty locally based on preconceived ideas, they now use the Local Matters approach: “Rather than assuming what communities and families experiencing poverty need, we worked with residents and local organisations to co-design interventions which we have been piloting in educational settings over the last twelve months”

Crucially they call for a need systemic implementation to ensure the sustainability of these policies in the longer term. This approach can be applied more widely and to greater effect at the level of local and national policy. Manchester Central Foodbank implore policymakers to adopt the ‘Local Matters’ research framework to create meaningful action on poverty in both local or national government.

At the current rate of reduction, it will take over 500 years for ‘disadvantaged’ children to match the exam success of their ‘advantaged’ peers.

By implementing a Local Matters approach, that identifies the localised and varied experiences of poverty, we can hope to make policy that brings that 500 year timeframe for eradicating that gap a little closer to the present day.